Foundation → Olympiad (Classes 6–8): Four-Level Hint Ladder
A Classes 6–8 Foundation-to-Olympiad bridge for productive struggle on a non-routine problem, delivered as a student-facing hint ladder and teacher solution.
Works on any free AI · Best tool: Any AI chat (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini)
✅ How to use this effectively
- 1. Name one secure Foundation starting skill.
- 2. Choose one non-routine Olympiad reasoning target.
- 3. Paste the completed prompt into any AI chat.
- 4. Check every ORIGINAL PRACTICE question and hint.
- 5. Release the ladder one rung at a time.
🔧 If it is not right, reply with this: If it only makes arithmetic harder, reply: “Keep the numbers age-appropriate and use this reasoning change instead: sequence hints as noticing, representation, key relation and near-complete step without revealing early.”
THE PROMPT
ROLE: Act as a Class 6–8 Foundation teacher and Olympiad reasoning coach. Build a genuine bridge: secure the entry skill first, then increase reasoning depth without pretending generated items are past questions. CONTEXT: Teach productive struggle on a non-routine problem. The bridge mechanic is to sequence hints as noticing, representation, key relation and near-complete step without revealing early. The final rung must require an Olympiad-style insight, not merely larger numbers or longer arithmetic. INPUTS — FILL EVERY FIELD: - Class: [CLASS 6, 7 OR 8] - Topic scope: [TOPIC SCOPE] - Foundation starting skill: [FOUNDATION STARTING SKILL] - Olympiad reasoning target: [OLYMPIAD REASONING TARGET] - Question count: [QUESTION COUNT] - Difficulty ladder: [DIFFICULTY LADDER] - Time available: [TIME AVAILABLE] - Learner needs: [LEARNER NEEDS] TASK: 1. Start with a one-item Foundation check that reveals whether the stated entry skill is secure. Do not move ahead when the response shows a prerequisite gap. 2. Build a student-facing hint ladder and teacher solution; every rung must have a named reasoning change, not just a difficulty adjective. 3. Apply this exact bridge mechanic: sequence hints as noticing, representation, key relation and near-complete step without revealing early. Explain why each transition is appropriate for Classes 6–8. 4. Label every generated question “ORIGINAL PRACTICE — not an authentic past question”. Never imitate or attribute an item to a named contest, year or source. 5. Provide a four-level hint path: notice, represent, connect and finish. The first two hints must not reveal the decisive step. 6. Give a complete teacher solution, a short student self-check and one transfer question that changes the surface while preserving the key idea. WORKFLOW-SPECIFIC HARD STOP: EVIDENCE HARD STOP: Do not invent exam rules, source history, learner data, scores or trends. Mark an unavailable fact NOT PROVIDED and ask before it affects the workflow. OUTPUT FORMAT — USE THESE HEADINGS IN ORDER: 1. Foundation entry check 2. Named reasoning ladder 3. a student-facing hint ladder and teacher solution 4. Four-level hint path 5. Olympiad transfer solution and self-check PRIMARY DELIVERABLE FORMAT: INTERACTIVE SESSION — script one teacher move and one learner response per turn, with a stop-and-check point before the next level. QUALITY GATE: - Segment fit is explicit in the content, not just a label. - Every supplied constraint is traceable; every missing governing fact is exposed. - Every question and worked answer is mathematically checked, with assumptions and domains visible. - Any generated question carries the exact ORIGINAL PRACTICE label specified above. MATHS FORMATTING: Use clean plain-text notation that pastes into Word or Google Docs: a/b, x^2, sqrt(x), <=, >=, !=, pi, theta, integral and sum. Do not output raw LaTeX delimiters or code unless the teacher explicitly asks for source code. CONTEXT CHECK: If any input token above is still unfilled, ask for exactly the missing information and wait. Never answer with an unfilled token or guess a teacher-controlled rule. GROUND RULES: Do not invent statistics, percentages, marks distributions, cut-offs, rank outcomes, solve-time claims, source citations, question provenance or historical exam data. Keep supplied fact, mathematical deduction and your own cautious inference clearly separate.