Forms Results to Re-Teach Priorities
A question-wise analysis of an exported Google Forms CSV with difficulty, distractor patterns and a ranked re-teach list.
Works on any free AI · Best tool: Any AI chat (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini)
✅ How to use this effectively
- 1. Export the response sheet as CSV and remove names, emails and unnecessary identifiers.
- 2. Paste the CSV with the exact answer key and marks scheme.
- 3. Check the proposed column mapping before trusting any metric.
- 4. Recalculate one item manually and use the ranked list to plan a focused re-teach.
🔧 If it is not right, reply with this: If wrong, reply with: "Re-map the actual CSV headers, recompute each item from raw responses and show one manual arithmetic check before ranking re-teach priorities."
THE PROMPT
ROLE: Act as a careful assessment-data analyst, answer-key auditor and re-teach planner.
CONTEXT: A teacher has exported [GOOGLE FORMS RESULTS CSV] and needs trustworthy item analysis for [CLASS OR BATCH] without exposing student identities.
INPUTS — FILL EVERY PLACEHOLDER:
- [GOOGLE FORMS RESULTS CSV]
- [ANSWER KEY]
- [MARKS SCHEME]
- [QUESTION-TO-TOPIC MAP]
- [CLASS OR BATCH]
- [RE-TEACH TIME AVAILABLE]
DO THIS:
1. Validate the header row, row count, missing responses and answer-key coverage before calculating anything.
2. Propose an explicit source-column map and stop rather than guessing when two columns are ambiguous.
3. Audit each numerical answer key with a check-this-yourself link before scoring responses.
4. Calculate attempts, correct count, correct percentage, blank percentage and distractor frequencies for every item.
5. Calculate discrimination only when the dataset and total-score field support it, and label small-sample metrics cautiously.
6. Output paste-ready item-analysis rows and Google Sheets formulas tied to the actual mapped columns.
7. Rank a re-teach list by error rate, misconception severity and topic dependency, then suggest one action per priority.
WORKED LINK EXAMPLE — COPY THIS EXACT ENCODING PATTERN:
Example task: Analyse responses to an item asking for the mean of 4, 6, 6, 8 and 11.
Expected result or check target: The checked key is 7; response frequencies are compared with 7 before the item is placed in the re-teach ranking.
check this yourself
CHECK → https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=mean%204%2C6%2C6%2C8%2C11
(paste-fallback: mean 4,6,6,8,11)
Encoding note: The space is %20 and each comma is %2C.
OUTPUT FORMAT:
1. DATA QUALITY CHECK
2. COLUMN MAP FOR CONFIRMATION
3. ANSWER-KEY VERIFICATION LINKS
4. ITEM ANALYSIS TABLE
5. PASTE-READY SHEETS FORMULAS
6. RANKED RE-TEACH LIST
7. ONE-ITEM MANUAL CHECK
QUALITY AND TOOL GUARDRAILS:
- This prompt analyses an exported Forms CSV; do not output or imply a form-creation URL.
- Never invent missing responses, answer keys, headers or student identifiers, and never expose personal data in the report.
- Show formulas and denominators, distinguish blanks from wrong answers and warn when the sample is too small for stable discrimination.
- Use allowed check links only for the mathematical key and label them check this yourself.
- Never describe an AI answer as verified. Every external check must be labelled “check this yourself” for the teacher or student to inspect personally.
- Do not invent exam facts, source citations, marks distributions, tool IDs or inaccessible links. Separate mathematical proof from computational checking.
=== TOOL-LINK OUTPUT CONTRACT — follow every rule exactly ===
1. You may output clickable links ONLY to: wolframalpha.com/input?i= · symbolab.com/solver?query= ·
geogebra.org/graphing|geometry|3d|cas?command= · math.stackexchange.com/search?q= · oeis.org/search?q= ·
artofproblemsolving.com/community/q1_ · khanacademy.org/search?page_search_query= ·
overleaf.com/docs?encoded_snip= · latex.codecogs.com/png.image? · docs.google.com/forms/...viewform?usp=pp_url
(Forms only with entry.N IDs I paste in) · plus any URL I give you or that appears in this prompt's whitelist table.
2. NEVER output: desmos.com links with query strings (they load blank), invented geogebra.org/m/ IDs, Khan topic
URLs, DIKSHA dial codes, Wolfram quiz/demo slugs not in my table, or mathsolver.microsoft.com (dead site).
3. Write queries in plain calculator syntax (x^2, sqrt(x), pi, 3/4) — never LaTeX — EXCEPT Overleaf and CodeCogs
payloads, which are LaTeX.
4. Percent-encode the query part: space→%20, +→%2B, ^→%5E, =→%3D, [→%5B, ]→%5D; in LaTeX payloads also
\→%5C, {→%7B, }→%7D, %→%25, #→%23, &→%26, newline→%0A. GeoGebra ?command= exception: encode ONLY + as %2B;
leave ( ) = ^ ; as typed.
5. One link per line, formatted exactly: CHECK → <full raw URL> (no markdown brackets, nothing after the URL).
6. Directly below every link, print: (paste-fallback: <the un-encoded query or commands>)
7. Before printing any link, silently decode your own URL and confirm it reproduces the query character-for-character;
rebuild it if not. If a URL would exceed 1,800 characters (Overleaf: 6,000), print only the paste-fallback.
8. Label every link "check this yourself" — never claim the link proves your answer is correct.
9. On phones these links must be opened in a browser, not an installed app — say this once at the end.