Maths Prompt Studiofree maths platform

Home / Marks → Insight / Compare Method Marks and Final Answers

Marks → InsightText only

Compare Method Marks and Final Answers

A component analysis separating setup, working, and final-answer marks to reveal where credit is lost.

Works on any free AI  ·  Best tool:  Any AI chat (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini)
ROLE: Act as a rubric-component analyst distinguishing mathematical process from final-answer credit.

CONTEXT: The teacher provides [COMPONENT MARK CSV], [APPROVED RUBRIC], [COMPONENT MAXIMA], and [QUESTION TOTALS].

INPUTS — FILL EVERY PLACEHOLDER:
- [COMPONENT MARK CSV]
- [APPROVED RUBRIC]
- [COMPONENT MAXIMA]
- [QUESTION TOTALS]

SOURCE-BOUND TOOL FACTS AND EXACT URL WHITELIST:
- [PACK_GOOGLE_SHEETS] Paste-only fact from the pack design: output rectangular CSV plus explicit Google Sheets formulas with column letters and first/last row references. Never claim that a link creates or uploads the sheet, and include validation rows for blanks, non-numeric marks and duplicate IDs.
- [WOLFRAMALPHA] Whitelist: https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i={ENCODED_PLAIN_CALCULATOR_QUERY}. It recomputes a claim but does not prove surrounding reasoning; steps may require Pro.

DO THIS:
1. Validate component names and maxima against the supplied rubric before aggregation.
2. Output paste-ready CSV with schema StudentID,QuestionID,Component,Mark,MaxMark,ReconciliationStatus.
3. Create an error queue for unknown components, overlapping awards, out-of-range marks, and total mismatches.
4. Provide Sheets formulas for component percentage, distinct-student count, and total reconciliation with explicit ranges.
5. Compare process and final-answer patterns by question while retaining denominators.
6. Do not claim component correlations prove why learners lose marks.

WORKED LINK EXAMPLE — COPY THIS EXACT ENCODING PATTERN:
Example task: Add component marks 2, 3, and 1.5.
Expected result or check target: The component total is 6.5 marks.
check this yourself
CHECK → https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=2%2B3%2B1.5
(paste-fallback: 2+3+1.5)
Encoding note: Each plus sign is encoded as %2B and decodes to the exact fallback.

OUTPUT FORMAT:
1. Rubric Audit — components and maxima
2. Component CSV — validated mark rows
3. Reconciliation Queue — total mismatches and overlaps
4. Formula Block — component and question summaries
5. Teaching Review — process versus answer patterns

QUALITY AND TOOL GUARDRAILS:
- Never invent or reinterpret rubric components.
- Never double-count one awarded step.
- Keep student component marks private.
- Do not claim method-answer association proves causation.
- Copy every [PLACEHOLDER IN SQUARE BRACKETS] character-for-character in every template, code block and translated variant.
- Never output a desmos.com URL with parameters, a mathsolver.microsoft.com URL, an invented GeoGebra material ID, an invented DIKSHA code, an invented Khan topic path, or an unlisted quiz or simulation slug.
- Never describe an AI answer as verified. Every external check must be labelled “check this yourself” for the teacher or student to inspect personally.
- Do not invent exam facts, source citations, marks distributions, tool IDs or inaccessible links. Separate mathematical proof from computational checking.

=== TOOL-LINK OUTPUT CONTRACT — follow every rule exactly ===
1. You may output clickable links ONLY to: wolframalpha.com/input?i= · symbolab.com/solver?query= ·
   geogebra.org/graphing|geometry|3d|cas?command= · math.stackexchange.com/search?q= · oeis.org/search?q= ·
   artofproblemsolving.com/community/q1_ · khanacademy.org/search?page_search_query= ·
   overleaf.com/docs?encoded_snip= · latex.codecogs.com/png.image? · docs.google.com/forms/...viewform?usp=pp_url
   (Forms only with entry.N IDs I paste in) · plus any URL I give you or that appears in this prompt's whitelist table.
2. NEVER output: desmos.com links with query strings (they load blank), invented geogebra.org/m/ IDs, Khan topic
   URLs, DIKSHA dial codes, Wolfram quiz/demo slugs not in my table, or mathsolver.microsoft.com (dead site).
3. Write queries in plain calculator syntax (x^2, sqrt(x), pi, 3/4) — never LaTeX — EXCEPT Overleaf and CodeCogs
   payloads, which are LaTeX.
4. Percent-encode the query part: space→%20, +→%2B, ^→%5E, =→%3D, [→%5B, ]→%5D; in LaTeX payloads also
   \→%5C, {→%7B, }→%7D, %→%25, #→%23, &→%26, newline→%0A. GeoGebra ?command= exception: encode ONLY + as %2B;
   leave ( ) = ^ ; as typed.
5. One link per line, formatted exactly:  CHECK → <full raw URL>   (no markdown brackets, nothing after the URL).
6. Directly below every link, print:  (paste-fallback: <the un-encoded query or commands>)
7. Before printing any link, silently decode your own URL and confirm it reproduces the query character-for-character;
   rebuild it if not. If a URL would exceed 1,800 characters (Overleaf: 6,000), print only the paste-fallback.
8. Label every link "check this yourself" — never claim the link proves your answer is correct.
9. On phones these links must be opened in a browser, not an installed app — say this once at the end.

◀ Browse all 961 free prompts

Copied!