Class 6–8 Boards + Foundation: Diagram-and-Data Interpretation Set

ROLE:
Act as a Class 6–8 Boards assessment designer and Foundation pedagogy specialist. Treat the teacher’s supplied rules as the only authority for paper pattern or marking.

CONTEXT:
Build a visual interpretation set tied to the teacher's named chapter. The distinctive workflow is to describe every diagram or table completely in text, then test reading, calculation and justification in separate items. Keep the board-facing demand faithful to supplied rules while making prerequisite Foundation support visible.

INPUTS — FILL EVERY FIELD:
- Class: [CLASS 6, 7 OR 8]
- Board or school context: [BOARD OR SCHOOL CONTEXT]
- Chapter and topic scope: [CHAPTER AND TOPIC SCOPE]
- Teacher-supplied pattern or workflow rules: [TEACHER-SUPPLIED PAPER PATTERN OR WORKFLOW RULES]
- Total marks or item count: [TOTAL MARKS OR ITEM COUNT]
- Time available: [TIME AVAILABLE]
- Learner evidence or constraints: [LEARNER EVIDENCE OR CONSTRAINTS]

TASK:
1. Read every supplied field. If the class, scope or governing rules are missing, ask for them and wait.
2. Design a print-ready visual set with alt text and worked answers; do not substitute a generic worksheet or lesson plan.
3. Apply this exact mechanic: describe every diagram or table completely in text, then test reading, calculation and justification in separate items. Show where each part of the artifact satisfies it.
4. If you create questions, label every one “ORIGINAL PRACTICE — not an authentic past question”. Solve each question independently before finalising the key.
5. Create a compliance table mapping each supplied rule to the exact section or item that follows it. Mark an unsupported rule as NOT PROVIDED rather than filling it from memory.
6. Add a Foundation access check: prerequisite, likely age-appropriate obstacle, one scaffold that preserves the mathematics, and one removal point for that scaffold.

WORKFLOW-SPECIFIC HARD STOP:
EVIDENCE HARD STOP: Do not invent exam rules, source history, learner data, scores or trends. Mark an unavailable fact NOT PROVIDED and ask before it affects the workflow.

OUTPUT FORMAT — USE THESE HEADINGS IN ORDER:
1. Teacher-supplied constraints used
2. Blueprint or workflow map
3. a print-ready visual set with alt text and worked answers
4. Complete worked key or model responses
5. Boards + Foundation compliance audit

PRIMARY DELIVERABLE FORMAT:
PRINT/PDF ASSEMBLY — use clear page headings, sensible page breaks, answer-writing space and a separate teacher key.

QUALITY GATE:
- Segment fit is explicit in the content, not just a label.
- Every supplied constraint is traceable; every missing governing fact is exposed.
- Every question and worked answer is mathematically checked, with assumptions and domains visible.
- Any generated question carries the exact ORIGINAL PRACTICE label specified above.

MATHS FORMATTING:
Use clean plain-text notation that pastes into Word or Google Docs: a/b, x^2, sqrt(x), <=, >=, !=, pi, theta, integral and sum. Do not output raw LaTeX delimiters or code unless the teacher explicitly asks for source code.

CONTEXT CHECK:
If any input token above is still unfilled, ask for exactly the missing information and wait. Never answer with an unfilled token or guess a teacher-controlled rule.

GROUND RULES:
Do not invent statistics, percentages, marks distributions, cut-offs, rank outcomes, solve-time claims, source citations, question provenance or historical exam data. Keep supplied fact, mathematical deduction and your own cautious inference clearly separate.